Add Our new Deepseek-based AI Says

2025-02-10 21:30:54 +00:00 · 2025-02-10 21:30:54 +00:00 · d500213e4c
commit d500213e4c
1 changed files with 53 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/Says.-.md
+++ b/Says.-.md
@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
 <br>Our new Deepseek-based [AI](https://justinsellssd.com) says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"<br>
 <br>Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based [AI](https://chaakri.com) trained to be better at forecasting<br>
 <br>Share this post<br>
 <br>Nobody can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training [AI](https://www.imdipet-project.eu) to offer it its finest shot. With up to date news and a small but feisty 14 Billion criterion model, our [AI](https://syair.co.id) is boldly anticipating the unpredictable. Join us as we attempt to respond to humanity's hardest questions.<br>
 <br>Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many [pushing questions](https://ehsuy.com) that are less easy to determine. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining questions from [locations](http://sams-up.com) like polymarket.com and [training](https://www.istorecanarias.com) a large language design to be better at predicting the future (and have seen some intriguing improvements - research paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.<br>
 <br>For more updates from the [AI](http://lo-well.de) world register for my newsletter!<br>
 <br>Background<br>
 <br>Our [AI](http://big5huntingsafaris.com) is a 14 billion criterion design which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months back so we have constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we supply the news and watch as the [AI](https://www.thebattleforboys.com) reasons its method through unidentified area to make its best prediction possible.<br>
 <br>And Now ... The Important Questions<br>
 <br>We presented the following [concerns](http://catx00x.hypermart.net) to our [AI](https://chaakri.com) and assessed its reaction. While we have seen forecast enhancements from our training, utilize these quotes for prop wagering at your own peril.<br>
 <br>Will [Travis Kelce](http://187.216.152.1519999) propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?<br>
 <br>[AI](http://a3-foundation.org) Final Prediction: 5% chance<br>
 <br>And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our [AI](https://harayacoaching.com) believes Taylor and Travis' [relationship](https://jozieswonderland.com) is rock solid, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl [proposal](https://fabrika-bar.si). Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal ...<br>
 <br>First, I'll look at the essential points from the short articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been helpful of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, showing her commitment.<br>
 <br>Some fans are thrilled, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically offered remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually triggered some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.<br>
 <br>I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the [Super Bowl](https://ralphoduor.com) is an important occasion, the chances and his reactions suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd approximate a low likelihood, possibly around 5%, considering all factors.<br>
 <br>Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the super bowl?<br>
 <br>[AI](https://ipaecurso.com) Final Prediction: 79% opportunity<br>
 <br>No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an [AI](https://seemysite.app) comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an [AI](https://www.onlycriers.com) even understand what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Looks like our [AI](https://green2light.com) thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and [strong legs](https://magikos.sk) and lower body (Does our [AI](https://git.kicker.dev) have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.<br>
 <br>Alright, I'm trying to figure out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it seems like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, [utilizes](http://www.inodesakademi.com) his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's  to [pressing](https://cruzazulfansclub.com) a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and  [garagesale.es](https://www.garagesale.es/author/emorydacey/) method.<br>
 <br>Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to perform the relocation. The short article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I also need to think about the protective methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles use it.<br>
 <br>Considering that more than 5 looks like a considerable number but possible offered their confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% chance. This represents their preparation, confidence in the method, and the likelihood that they'll use it several times, specifically if it's efficient early on.<br>
 <br>Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program efficiency?<br>
 <br>[AI](https://theconfidentlyawkward.com) Final Prediction: 65% opportunity<br>
 <br>While our [AI](http://kindring.cn:25923) might not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any [physical](https://xpressrh.com) manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth,  [social.japrime.id](https://social.japrime.id/read-blog/30080_artificial-general-intelligence.html) but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.<br>
 <br>From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration during a previous [halftime](https://wiki.kulturhusetjonkoping.se) show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems considerable due to the fact that it reveals he's done it previously, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current articles, it discusses that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That might mean he's less likely to deal with Trump this time.<br>
 <br>However, he's likewise involved in a feud with Drake, which might offer him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation match from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about consisting of any questionable tunes in the performance. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.<br>
 <br>Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar might feel obliged to make a statement. However,  [wiki.tld-wars.space](https://wiki.tld-wars.space/index.php/Utilisateur:JuniorShephard2) the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the halftime program, so there's a risk that such material might be limited or softened.<br>
 <br>On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong proceed big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which might give him more imaginative freedom. Plus, his past habits recommends he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.<br>
 <br>But I also remember reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could suggest he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's focusing on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, existing shifts in focus, legal problems, and the event's context-the possibility seems to be moderately high, possibly around 65%.<br>
 <br>Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the very bowl?<br>
 <br>[AI](https://venezia.co.in) Final Prediction: 25% chance<br>
 <br>Lets be truthful, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the fact that our [AI](http://13.228.87.95) has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a [fresh burger](https://megapersonals18.com) taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of a chance that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.<br>
 <br>From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't suggest to cause offense and that he really [discovered](https://inmoactive.com) it funny himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.<br>
 <br>Taking a look at the articles, it points out that Andy Reid is a food lover and likes cheeseburgers. There's a short article specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who delights in consuming, specifically with his team. So, if there were plans to [celebrate](https://git.tissue.works) after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the scenario is on screen for an event.<br>
 <br>Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?<br>
 <br>[AI](https://thecakerybymarfit.com) Final Prediction: 50% opportunity<br>
 <br>"Tails never fails?" You can't trick the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially lucrative? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our [AI](https://sistemko.net) can't be deceived and believes anything can happen when that coin enters the air.<br>
 <br>Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historical information that might influence this forecast.<br>
 <br>First, I check out through the articles supplied. They all point out the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has actually turned up regularly than [heads traditionally](https://harayacoaching.com). Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a substantial distinction.<br>
 <br>However, I bear in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The minor historic edge for tails could be due to opportunity. But when making forecasts, often people weigh historic information even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I should consider whether this historical bias ought to influence the likelihood.<br>
 <br>After thinking about it, I choose that while the historical information reveals a slight preference for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the [probability](https://sbbam.me) away from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists however doesn't override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.<br>
 <br>Will the [referees cheat](https://gitea.cronin.one) to help the [Chiefs win](https://subwebco.com) the [Super Bowl](https://adek.es)?<br>
 <br>[AI](https://okeanos.evfr.de) Final Prediction: 1% opportunity<br>
 <br>We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably think the very same. BUT, its official now since our [AI](https://www.carsinjamaica.com) states the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a [nationwide](http://karatekyokushin.wex.pl) scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!<br>
 <br>[AI](https://www.justicefornorthcaucasus.com) Reasoning:<br>
 <br>Okay, so I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of posts that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable contact recent games,  [macphersonwiki.mywikis.wiki](https://macphersonwiki.mywikis.wiki/wiki/Usuario:CamilleZdc) specifically the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get annoyed when their group loses due to what they view as [bad officiating](https://www.almanacar.com).<br>
 <br>But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and  [cadizpedia.wikanda.es](https://cadizpedia.wikanda.es/wiki/Usuario:MichalHalverson) the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "absurd." They say there's no proof of methodical predisposition. That's a strong statement from the individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might suggest there's no genuine basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some truth to it.<br>
 <br>Taking a look at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also pointed out that statistical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have actually been penalized more since 2022. That's intriguing due to the fact that if they were getting unique treatment, you might expect fewer penalties, right?<br>
 <br>...<br>
 <br>So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably extremely low. Maybe not zero because you can't eliminate every possibility, however [incredibly](https://www.jordanfilmrental.com) unlikely.<br>
 <br>Summary<br>
 <br>There you have it everyone, is it even worth watching the video game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock market. Fingers [crossed](https://theweedtube.org) for an excellent game! And hi, if it ends up our [AI](http://guleryuzbeton.com) was wrong about whatever, at least it can gain from this.<br>