Add Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says

2025-02-12 20:41:37 +00:00 · 2025-02-12 20:41:37 +00:00 · 1849488862
parent 6cb4c5d4d3
commit 1849488862
1 changed files with 53 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/Says.-.md
+++ b/Says.-.md
@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
 <br>Our brand-new Deepseek-based [AI](https://arentiaseguros.es) states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"<br>
 <br>Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based [AI](https://www.azzurriniguardese.it) trained to be better at forecasting<br>
 <br>Share this post<br>
 <br>Nobody can [predict](https://withmaui.com) the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training [AI](https://shoden-giken.com) to provide it its finest shot. With as much as date news and a small but spirited 14 Billion criterion design, our [AI](https://www.yanyikele.com) is boldly predicting the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to address mankind's toughest concerns.<br>
 <br>Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as two years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain many pressing concerns that are less simple to select. Our company, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some [appealing enhancements](https://www.glcyoungmarines.org) - research paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can [anticipate](https://instituto.disitec.pe) this Sunday.<br>
 <br>For more updates from the [AI](https://speakitinc.com) world subscribe to my newsletter!<br>
 <br>Background<br>
 <br>Our [AI](http://cesareburgazzi.it) is a 14 billion [specification design](https://harmonia345.com) which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months back so we have developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each [question](http://filmmaniac.ru) we supply the news and watch as the [AI](https://zkml-hub.arml.io) [reasons](https://fanblogs.jp) its method through unknown territory to make its best prediction possible.<br>
 <br>And Now ... The Important Questions<br>
 <br>We postured the following concerns to our [AI](http://47.92.109.230:8080) and assessed its response. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, use these quotes for prop betting at your own danger.<br>
 <br>Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?<br>
 <br>[AI](http://allianceforgoodgovernment.org) Final Prediction: 5% chance<br>
 <br>Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our [AI](http://uvbnb.ru) believes Taylor and [Travis'](http://www.blueshotel.de) relationship is rock strong, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...<br>
 <br>First, I'll look at the crucial points from the posts. Travis has [remained](https://tv.goftesh.com) in a relationship with Taylor since 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her buddies and family to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.<br>
 <br>Some fans are thrilled, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly offered remarks Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has actually triggered some Swifties to [question](http://www.albertasrl.it) how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their [relationship private](https://aprendendo.blog.br) and not resolving the speculation straight.<br>
 <br>I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the [chances](http://git.vimer.top3000) and his actions suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a [certainty](http://cultivationnetwork.com). I 'd approximate a low likelihood, possibly around 5%, thinking about all aspects.<br>
 <br>Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the incredibly bowl?<br>
 <br>[AI](https://tehnotrafic.ro) Final Prediction:  [ura.cc](https://ura.cc/stepaniebi) 79% opportunity<br>
 <br>No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from [utilizing](https://mga.mn) their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a various front-tush being pushed. Will an [AI](http://aisoft.co.kr) understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an [AI](https://www.modnymagazin.sk) even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the [Chiefs stopped](http://getnobody.com) (debate aside) [Josh Allen's](https://www.drkarthik.in) comparable efforts? Looks like our [AI](https://bcgiso.com) thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our [AI](http://hetnieuweontslagrecht.info) have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this game.<br>
 <br>Alright, I'm attempting to figure out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand what precisely a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it [appears](https://lecrest.com) like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to [pushing](https://sneakerxp.com) a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and technique.<br>
 <br>[Article](https://stichtingprimula.nl) 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The short article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I likewise require to think about the protective methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they might adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles utilize it.<br>
 <br>Considering that more than five appears like a significant number but possible given their self-confidence, I would [approximate](https://www.mandmautomotivesales.com) a possibility around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the likelihood that they'll use it a number of times, specifically if it works early on.<br>
 <br>Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime show efficiency?<br>
 <br>[AI](http://pflegebetrieb-anwalt.de) Final Prediction: 65% opportunity<br>
 <br>While our [AI](http://t2lfitness.com) might not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.<br>
 <br>From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That [appears considerable](https://wiki.streampy.at) since it shows he's done it in the past, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more [current](https://git.andreaswittke.de) articles, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That could mean he's less likely to address Trump this time.<br>
 <br>However, he's likewise involved in a fight with Drake, which might offer him factors to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation match from Drake, so possibly he's cautious about consisting of any questionable tunes in the performance. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still want to perform it, even if it's [uncertain](https://elsantanderista.com).<br>
 <br>Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might [feel obliged](https://moviesthoery.com) to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the [halftime](https://dollaresumes.com) program, so there's a risk that such material might be limited or softened.<br>
 <br>On the other hand, Lamar has a [performance history](http://www.otasukemama.com) of making bold carry on big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the [halftime](https://www.hoohaa.com.ng) show, which might give him more imaginative liberty. Plus, his previous habits [recommends](http://soccerworldcomplex.com) he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.<br>
 <br>But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, present shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion's context-the likelihood appears to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.<br>
 <br>Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the very bowl?<br>
 <br>[AI](http://git.vimer.top:3000) Final Prediction: 25% opportunity<br>
 <br>Lets be sincere, [Andy Reid](https://cifi.co.jp) loves cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the fact that our [AI](https://lns-group.pro) has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its [forecast](https://www.ayc.com.au)? Looks like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.<br>
 <br>From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a [cheeseburger](https://cntrc.org) during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't mean to [trigger offense](https://bbs.tsingfun.com) which he actually found it [amusing](https://kyigit.kyigd.com3000) himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might suggest he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.<br>
 <br>Taking a look at the articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who delights in eating, specifically with his team. So, if there were plans to [commemorate](https://vlevs.com) after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the circumstance is on screen for a celebration.<br>
 <br>Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?<br>
 <br>[AI](https://tuavidafit.com.br) Final Prediction: 50% opportunity<br>
 <br>"Tails never ever fails?" You can't trick the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been [predicting](http://chaek.ru) the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially [lucrative](https://regalsense1stusa.com)? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our [AI](https://git.pyzone.club) can't be deceived and thinks anything can take place when that  the air.<br>
 <br>Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the [Super Bowl](http://lilith-edit.com) will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some [historical data](https://lionawakener.com) that may influence this forecast.<br>
 <br>First, I check out the articles provided. They all discuss the [historic statistics](https://tomtelliercoaching.fr) of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has actually turned up more typically than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the [outcome](https://bsg-aoknordost.de) 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a big distinction.<br>
 <br>However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is normally considered random. The minor historical edge for tails could be due to [opportunity](https://gst.meu.edu.jo). But when making predictions, sometimes individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I ought to think about whether this historic predisposition needs to affect the possibility.<br>
 <br>After [thinking](http://be2c2.fr) of it, I choose that while the historic information reveals a [minor choice](http://h4ahomeinspections.com) for tails, it's not statistically substantial sufficient to move the probability away from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the possibility, [acknowledging](https://git.o-for.net) that the minor [historic edge](https://municipalitzem.barcelona) exists however doesn't bypass the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.<br>
 <br>Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?<br>
 <br>[AI](http://fanaticosband.com) Final Prediction: 1% possibility<br>
 <br>We get it, you believe the refs like [Patrick Mahomes](https://mbgazeta.ru) and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely believe the same. BUT, its authorities now due to the fact that our [AI](https://tonypolecastro.com) states the [possibilities](https://wiki.streampy.at) are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to [win fair](https://minesec.gov.cm) and square!<br>
 <br>[AI](https://daoberpfaelzergoldfluach.de) Reasoning:<br>
 <br>Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the [Chiefs win](https://db-it.dk) the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite [major accusation](https://music.spotivik.com). Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of articles that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are [prejudiced](https://daytimer.ru) towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some [doubtful calls](https://inthelionsdenbook.com) in recent video games, particularly the [AFC Championship](http://seattlecaraccidenthelp.com) Game. That does appear to spark some [uncertainty](https://doorthijs.nl). I can see why fans may get annoyed when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.<br>
 <br>But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and  [townshipmarket.co.za](https://www.townshipmarket.co.za/user/profile/20128) the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "absurd." They state there's no proof of methodical predisposition. That's a strong statement from the individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may suggest there's no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some fact to it.<br>
 <br>Looking at the articles, several [sources](https://tubeseen.com) like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also discussed that analytical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, [Mike Pereira](https://zkml-hub.arml.io) from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have been punished more because 2022. That's fascinating since if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate fewer charges,  [wiki.lexserve.co.ke](http://wiki.lexserve.co.ke/index.php/User:ShelleyDinkel) right?<br>
 <br>...<br>
 <br>So, putting everything together, the likelihood that [referees](https://funsilo.date) will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't dismiss every possibility, however very unlikely.<br>
 <br>Summary<br>
 <br>There you have it everyone, is it even worth enjoying the video game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the video game turns out before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good video game! And hi, if it ends up our [AI](http://ritewingrc.com) was incorrect about whatever, at least it can gain from this.<br>