greenhedgehog

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to provide it its finest shot. With up to date news and a little however lively 14 Billion criterion model, our AI is boldly predicting the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to address mankind's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pressing concerns that are less simple to pin down. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing enhancements - research study paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from lots of months earlier so we have developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each we supply the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown territory to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following questions to our AI and determined its reaction. While we have actually seen forecast improvements from our training, use these estimates for prop betting at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor archmageriseswiki.com Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll look at the essential points from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even welcomed her loved ones to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.

Some fans are delighted, while others, disgaeawiki.info especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship personal and not addressing the speculation straight.

I think the key points are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the chances and his actions recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, considering all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm trying to figure out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it looks like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to perform the relocation. The short article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is quite high. ... I likewise require to think of the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they might adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five appears like a substantial number but possible given their confidence, I would estimate a likelihood around 60-70% opportunity. This accounts for their preparation, self-confidence in the strategy, and the likelihood that they'll utilize it numerous times, particularly if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That appears considerable because it reveals he's done it previously, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent articles, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could indicate he's less most likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's also involved in a feud with Drake, which may give him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement fit from Drake, so possibly he bewares about consisting of any questionable tunes in the performance. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he might still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements throughout the halftime program, so there's a danger that such content may be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making bold carry on big stages. He's the first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which may offer him more creative freedom. Plus, his past behavior recommends he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar expressed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the probability seems to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Appears like theres somewhat of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't mean to cause offense which he actually found it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might suggest he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the short articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who takes pleasure in consuming, particularly with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would engage in a cheeseburger, specifically if the circumstance is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and thinks anything can occur when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there's some historical information that may affect this forecast.

First, I review the posts supplied. They all discuss the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has actually shown up more often than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a small edge, but it's not a big difference.

However, I bear in mind that the result of a coin toss is generally considered random. The slight historical edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making predictions, in some cases individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I ought to think about whether this historical bias should influence the probability.

After considering it, I decide that while the historic data shows a small preference for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the minor historic edge exists but doesn't bypass the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably believe the exact same. BUT, its official now due to the fact that our AI says the chances are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite major allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of posts that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful hire current games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get irritated when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "ludicrous." They say there's no proof of systematic bias. That's a strong statement from the individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it might suggest there's no real basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some fact to it.

Looking at the short articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that analytical analysis doesn't show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have been penalized more considering that 2022. That's intriguing due to the fact that if they were getting unique treatment, you might expect fewer charges, right?

...

So, putting all of it together, the probability that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't rule out every possibility, however exceptionally not likely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth enjoying the game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great game! And hello, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.